Why Transporters Should Not Route Vendor Payments Through Employees’ Personal UPI Accounts

By Prabuddh Baiid

Why Transporters Should Not Route Vendor Payments Through Employees’ Personal UPI Accounts (Income Tax Risk Explained)

Many Indian transport companies follow this system:

  1. The company transfers ₹2–5 lakhs daily from its current account to an employee’s savings account
  2. The employee pays vendors, drivers and diesel pumps using UPI
  3. At month end, the employee submits “hisaab” (expense reconciliation)

This structure can create a serious and often overlooked problem:

👉 Employees receiving Income Tax scrutiny notices due to high transaction volumes in their personal accounts.

If you are a fleet owner or transporter routing vendor payments through employees, this article explains the real risk.


Why Large Business Transactions in Savings Accounts Trigger Red Flags

Savings accounts are meant for personal use.

When an employee’s account starts receiving:

It stands out in the banking and tax reporting system.

From a compliance perspective, it raises a simple question:

Why is a salaried employee handling crores in annual inflows?

The transaction pattern does not look like a normal salary account.

This can trigger:


AIS (Annual Information Statement) Reflects High-Value Transactions

India’s tax ecosystem is data-driven.

High-value banking transactions get reflected in the Annual Information Statement (AIS) linked to an individual’s PAN.

If an employee earning ₹30,000 per month is routing:

That mismatch between salary and transaction volume becomes visible in the system.

Even if no tax is payable, the employee may receive notices asking for clarification.


Employees Are Forced to Justify Company Transactions

When a notice is issued, the employee must:

This creates unnecessary stress and internal friction.


You Are Transferring Business Risk to Employees

Let’s be clear:

The employee did not design the payment structure.

The company did.

Yet regulatory scrutiny attaches to:

That is avoidable risk.

As transaction volumes grow, this model becomes increasingly dangerous.


Why This Model Does Not Scale for Transport Businesses

Routing vendor payments through employees’ personal UPI accounts creates:

Scaling requires structured systems, not informal routing.


What Transporters Should Do Instead

Instead of:

Company Current Account → Employee Savings Account → Vendor

Build:

Company Current Account → Structured Business Payment System → Verified Vendor

✅ Pay Vendors Directly From the Company Account

Eliminate personal account routing.

✅ Maintain a Verified Vendor Master

✅ Implement Approval Workflows

If vendor details change → approval resets.

✅ Role-Based Access Without Fund Transfer

Employees can initiate payments without personally holding company funds.

✅ Maintain a Complete Audit Trail

Track:


How MarketPe Helps Transporters Avoid Income Tax & Compliance Risk

Transport businesses need payment control — not more complexity.

MarketPe enables transporters to:

This protects:


Final Takeaway

If large vendor payments are flowing through employees’ personal UPI accounts, it is only a matter of time before:

Structured payment infrastructure is safer, scalable, and future-ready.

For growing transport companies in India, upgrading payment controls is no longer optional.